Screenshots of Visual Studio 2005, and where to go next?
April 6, 2004 2:48 PM
MSDN has posted a huge preview of Visual Studio .NET 2005 (formally known as VS.NET "Whidbey"). It's full of screenshots, interesting information, and code comparisons to older versions. There's also information about Visual Studio Orcas, the next major version of Visual Studio, which is being built to take advantage of the new technologies provided by Longhorn.
I'm wondering if anybody has a link for something that shows the direction that the popular free Java-based development environment/framework Eclipse is heading. I'd like to see how it is evolving and improving.
As a "hobby" developer (I built this site and the framework that powers it, but I don't code professionally), I find the current versions of Visual Studio to be overwhelming (too much functionality) and Eclipse to be underwhelming (not enough functionality, even with free plug-ins), so I use FrontPage 2003.
The things I need are color coding, auto-complete/intellisense, WebDAV, WYSIWYG view for prototyping, and the keyboard shortcut keys that I've become used to from using Microsoft Office. Plus it needs to load fast, let me work on multiple web sites (or open multiple instances with ease), look like a Windows XP application in Windows XP (Eclipse looks like a tweaked Windows 98 app to me), and let me determine how I place my curly-braces. I'm not doing any server-side debugging with ASP (haven't had a need, rolled my own simple debug.writeline class), but I will definitely want to have good debugging tools when it comes time to port this site's framework to ASP.NET... Visual Studio 2005 looks nice, but I fear it might still be to much for me.
I wish the IntelliJ IDEA guys had an IDE for ASP.NET cooking... I'm always impressed with their Java tools and UI design. I've seen rumors of such a beast, but it seems to have been downgraded to a VS.NET plug-in.
Anybody have experience with the free Web Matrix project from the ASP.NET team? I wish Microsoft opened this to the community Eclipse-style to let it grow more. Maybe it's the lack of links on it's web site, but it looks to me like there's no community involvement and limited community acceptance around Web Matrix.
Comments
Related Posts
Category: Microsoft
- Hardware manufactures - stop overstuffing the Start Menu! March 23, 2006 5:16:00 PM
- Mix 06 - Watch it now for free March 20, 2006 2:07:00 PM
- Microsoft Office 2006 September 18, 2005 10:50:00 AM
- Is Firefox security more hype than truth? September 18, 2005 10:42:00 AM
- Windows Vista July 21, 2005 11:28:00 PM
- 87 more in Microsoft...
Category: Development
- 20% time produces cool new features for Atlassian April 22, 2005 3:14:00 PM
- You know you're a Java weenie when... April 1, 2005 10:26:00 AM
- Microsoft-sponsored Code Camp in Northern Virginia March 29, 2005 2:41:00 PM
http://www.timmacrina
Posted April 6, 2004 4:42 PM
I use Visual Studio 2003 for my site. I only use it for the features you mentioned except for the office shortcuts (not sure if they work???). I don't use any of the other features. The properties window is very cool; it allows you to see all of the properties for a certain object when you select it. FrontPage is good but in my opinion once you switch to .NET you will want to use VS to manage the code behind files. I've read that Whidbey will have a template feature that allows you to more easily add repetitive items on your site to each page (i.e. a navigation menu). I can't wait for Whidbey for this one feature in itself.
http://www.cpfeifer.org
Posted April 6, 2004 10:58 PM
It's really easy to see where eclispe is going, here's a simple formula:
1) start with the most recent version of VS
2) step back 3 years3) see what features existed4) there you goSee Dylan it's not about what features are in Eclipse, per se. "It's the economy^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H plug-ins stupid!"
Again, that's the beauty of the open source community: choice rules over productivity.
I love java, I love eclipse, but VS is way more innovative and productive than any java ide out there. And yes, I know VS doesn't support refactoring like IntelliJ and eclipse do, but there's a ton of cool base productivity features that IntelliJ and Eclispe haven't stolen, uh, *borrowed* from VS yet.
Posted June 2, 2004 1:14 PM
Eclipse and visual studio are different things.
Eclipse is a Java EDITOR and Visual Studio is a complete development environment. With eclipse you edit code and then you deploy (and sometimes compile) that in the sun microsystems way (by hand) while with visual studio you do all the things in the same place.But editing code eclipse is a lot better than visual studio. Have you seen the new 3.0M9 version? It has a lot more intellisense than Visual Studio. It has many many more options to solve small things like you forgot to catch an exception or you assigned a variable with a value of another type.I wonder what it would be if it were a development environment.http://www.DylanGreene.com
Posted June 2, 2004 3:25 PM
Thanks Jose - I've looked at 3.0M9 and I've also played with Visual Studio 2005 (a beta of the next major release).
The intellisense is still better in the new visual studio - when you have an error it doesn't just tell you that you forgot a ;, you can click on one link to go to that line or another to just fix it by adding the ; and continue.
I also have two monitors and not being able to drag sidebars to the other monitor in Eclipse M9 is kind of a pain, and the funky non-Windows UI is somewhat jarring. They use SWT to take advantage of the native controls, but then don't use the native controls?
I still think Eclipse has potential and I'm looking forward to M10.
I still think
Posted September 21, 2004 4:28 AM
Please, don't waste your time in religious wars. Eclipse is one thing, and VS is another thing. Both products are very good, and both have upsides and downsides. Be practical and use the product you feel more comfortable with.
Greetings
Posted December 26, 2004 6:03 PM
I've been using a little bit VS but almost no eclipse , i like the borland IDE's, Jbuilder and c++ builder, first it's creepy to see too many buttons but probably you won't use many of them and after a short time, you'll get the basics and discover neat things, it's the same in VS, but I didn't like VS because it was missing a couple of things I think really help while developing
-Refactoring, many times you have som nasty code and refactoring really helps,
-Instant API, heh i like this one since it's very unlikely to be a person who memorize the whole API documentation functions etc, you know functions are there etc. but typing an object and then displaying what functions it had PLUS the breif description of it and parameters it's really good.-Typo-checking, many times you type boolaen instead of boolean, and since there's only one boolean it's nice to have the ide show the typo before compiling and getting a cryptic non-undesrstadable compiler error or warning message, Plus some IDES even scan and keep track of your custom data types and functions so even if you mistype one you made it tells, hey I don't see these function anywhere in your code!i think those 3 are the best 3 things i look for in and IDE, plus it would be great it VS redesigned it's error messages in c++ :) since missing a ";" will spawn like 4536 errors from keyword not found to your computer is overheating and i don't detect ice cubes nearby..
http://www.realityinteractive.com/rgrzywinski/
Posted January 3, 2005 9:54 AM
Jose, I'm not looking to start a flame war, but Eclipse is not an editor. To quote their whitepaper (http://www.eclipse.org/whitepapers/eclipse-overview.pdf):
"The Eclipse Platform is designed for building integrated development environments (IDEs) that can be used to create applications as diverse as web sites, embedded Java(tm) programs, C++ programs, and Enterprise JavaBeans(tm) .... The Eclipse Platform is an IDE for anything, and for nothing in particular."
So Eclipse "has-a" (composition) a Java editor.
http://www.tatvasoft.com
Posted March 5, 2008 6:35 AM
Visual Studio 2005